Let's be honest, 100GB is a lot of space, not everyone can afford it, but this is the main thing with plug-ins. For something this particular and huge technology step, I would go for an 50 to 100GB VST if it allows me to have a perfect result like with the websites I mentioned. If only it was even possible (I take it slow, just in case I say something impossible) to package the AI with it's training data in 50GB, I'll sure go for it. That was exactly my thought after all that evening discussing about it. Take care to yourself, have the best day mates ! Thanks for reading me and maybe answering to me, tell me what y'all think. I really want to achieve this result by myself, even got an AAA plugin and it doesn't do the job as well as the websites algo. But the websites does the job even with complex ones. So imagine the worst result with more complex track. Maybe the difference is too subtle for some of you, but know that it's a "simple" track construction, there's just a piano behind the voice. Right time to mention that I don't do promotion to this but use it as a comparison like "Why is this thing better than this overprice thing ?"Īnd now the RX9 processed audio, just the isolated vocal for the example: Dorpbox direct player for the isolated vocal with RX9 So I tried to isolate the parts with Lalal:ai and it makes those results: Dropbox direct player for the isolated vocalsĭropbox direct player for the isolated instumentalĪs you can hear, the result is pretty insane, really nothing to say about the isolated vocal, maybe a bit of vocal background in the isolated instrumental but that's like.
Time for examples: The song taken for example here is " Yebba's Heartbreak from Drake" (Yebba's interlude on CLB album - Youtube official link) Obviously I don't ask to the dev because he wouldn't say it, I understand, that's their "secret sauce" and their way to pay the bills. AAA company like iZotope can't make an AI as good as an indy website dev.
#Acapella extractor reddit how to#
I know I can sound awful with such an amazing tool but the thing that hits me, like I said, if it was the only tool and the best, I would be so happy, but "simple" websites makes better results.ĭo you know why ? And maybe how to achieve the same algorithm than those sites by ourselves ? I'm like. Very good results when you're used to bad vocal EQ's, but not really that good with weird artifacts, underwater effects, still some percussion sounds in the background etc.
We are used to good results with our technology, but no insane results, there's always artifacts and weird effects like when you EQ a lot, water effect you know ? Like if the song was played underwater ! And, besids its price and reputation and all, RX9 does the same results. I thought that they had the stems and made you think that this is how it sounds when edited, like "Look how good is it, buy our credits" xD It may sounds idiot but if you experienced a lot isolating vocals past years, you would probably react like I did. Tbh at the beginning it was so unbelievable that I thought it was fake to make you buy credits. Quick example for those who don't want to try those sites, if I isolate vocals from any song with Lalal:ai for example, the instrumental and the vocals (in separate tracks) are insanely clean, it's really like you have the stems. All (ALL) the methodes that I can find except those sites leads to worst results. So I was like "Ok man, you're not a beginner with you DAW, maybe you can do without those sites which are (mostly) for beginner who wants fast results, and do the same by yourself, more efforts but no need to buy credits, endless convertions"īut here we are. I used it many many times, and my only regret is that those websites needs money to run (that's legit on one side) so you can't convert endlessly. Not to shame iZotope, their plugin is a monster in general, and sometimes Music Rebalance works well, but my point here is that websites algo (like the ones I gave before) are faaaaar away in results, cleaner and richer. But the Music Rebalance, which is the feature that is supposed to isolate vocals, or percs, or synths etc, is not good everytime. (1.200$ when not in sale - 800$ actually for the cyber monday sales) RX9 is probably the "best" plugin called when it comes to edit/repair audio and I don't doubt about it for 99% of its uses. In my experience, I'm pretty sure I can now say that for today, 2021, I have much better results in isolating vocals from songs via website (the best ones and most famous for me are Acapella-extractor:com and Lalal:ai) but the first one often doesn't accept a certain song for no reason and the second one is based on credits, so money etc.īut, they legit are beating all the methods you can find on youtube via stock plugins or even AAA plugins that costs an entire body like iZotope RX9 Audio Editor. A bit of an simple question but maybe not.
0 kommentar(er)
